What
the Bible has to say on Revival
There
is no shortage of books about Christian revivals. Over the decades I
have read a fair cross section of them, so why do I want to go back
to basics and look at biblical examples? The answer is a bold one: I
think on the whole that the books are missing vital elements.
To
be sure some of the stories of past revivals make exciting and
inspirational reading which is good as far as it goes, but I want to
know more. Also authors of these put their own spin on them. Some are
super-spiritual and discount the human – sociological factors,
human psychology and techniques of persuasion. Others go to the
other extreme of denying anything except these human elements.
Finally some produce one-size-fits-all human based blueprints for
revival which strike me as pretty useless.
So
I want to go back to basics.
A
word of warning before we enter the world of the Bible. I happen to
believe it – which sets me apart from an awful lot of modern church
ministers! For those who eschew the Old Testament, just two quick
points. Sure the Old Testament pointed forward to Jesus and found its
fulfilment in him, but Jesus quoted it as authoritative in teaching
and said “I did not come to do away with the
Law and Prophets” (which is what they called what we call
the “Old Testament”) So If one believes in Jesus one is committed
to taking the OT as authoritative too. Second point is the statement
in 1 Corinthians 10.11 about the experiences of the Israelites in the
desert: “These things happened to them as
examples and were written down as warnings for us...” This
should alert us to the fact that there are things to be learned from
the narratives in the OT. So far from being “just a Jewish history”
as I have heard it described, we have deliberately preserved for us
in the OT narratives historical scenarios which have something to
teach us.
I
also happen to credit God with more (infinitely more!) than average
human intelligence which sets me apart from an awful lot of
“Christian” platform speakers and their followers. Here is what I
mean: First they treat the Bible as a grab bag of quotes to back up
their own one-eyed ideas – they wouldn't dare do that if they
really believed it came from God! Then they read it in a literalistic
way – as if God didn't know about the figures of speech and plays
on words that even pretty dumb humans use all the time.
For
example we understand a play on words – as in this joke: “There
are two fish in a tank; one turns to the other and says 'Hey do you
know how to drive this thing?'” Guess what? God uses plays on words
too! For instance a very simple play in Jeremiah 1.11-12 where the
footnote in your Bible should tell you that in the original Hebrew
“almond tree” and “watching” sound alike.
If
we interpreted our everyday language literalistically – which we
don't – we would get ridiculous meanings. This is exploited for
humour by one author (Terry Pratchett) in this example: “A brass
plaque on the wall proclaimed that – against all gynaecological
probability – 'Fred Bloggs was born here'”.
Other
aspects of “methodology” will be discussed and developed as we
go. If I were to put up a starting hypothesis to test it would be
something like this:
a)
There is no one-size-fits-all pattern of revival. Rather a great
variety to suit different situations.
b)
The initiative for revival is generally taken by God alone, but
occasionally in response to the prayers of devout people.
c)
Human agents are generally invited to play a role. Occasionally human
agents unwittingly play a role.
d)
God frequently utilises crises and sociological factors to motivate
revival, and uses many honest techniques of persuasion.
Case
Study : The Golden Calf – Exodus 32
I'm
not going to treat this one in depth
because it has many unique features.
But
I think it is fair to
use it
as an illustration is the role played by a
leader chosen by God.
It would appear God was going to destroy the Israelites for turning
away from him so quickly and attributing his deliverance of them from
Egypt to an idol in the form of a golden calf, but in
answer to Moses' petition spared them.
Ps
106.23 Puts this graphically even painting the image of a warrior
defending the breach made by an
enemy in a city wall: “So
he (God)
said he would destroy them— had not Moses, his chosen one, stood in
the breach before him to keep his wrath from destroying them.”
From
this I deduce that a person God has appointed leader may be able by
their intercession to be responsible for God – in this case
dramatically - changing his intentions, or in a more ordinary way
sending revival. We
may be able to refine this observation as we examine further cases.
No comments:
Post a Comment