Separation of Church and State
Now
might be a good point in our exploration of “Saving the West” to
think about the separation of church and state.
Jesus
famously said “render unto Caesar what is
Caesar's and to God what is God's.” Although he was at the
time adroitly avoiding the trap his enemies had carefully set for
him. To his disciples he stressed how differently those he gave
spiritual authority to were to act compared to “rulers of the
world”. Later when Pilate questioned him about the allegation that
he was a rival king to Caesar he answered : “My
kingdom is not of this world.”.
Given
this it seems out of character that Christian “organised religion”
rapidly became just like “the rulers of this world”.
It is just a (very sad) fact of church history that so often prelates
have seemed only interested in power and money. I won't labour the
point, but the fact is that history is replete with power struggles
between “the church” and the secular ruler. Conversely, secular
rulers have at many times sought to control organised religion both
to legitimate their rule and as a means of controlling the populace.
Out of
this insalubrious past came emancipation in more recent times. Young
countries like the United States where early settlers were fleeing
persecution and the government telling them what they should believe
enshrined the “separation of church and state”. Old countries
like Great Britain who had an “established church” broke that
connection.
This is
all common knowledge, but it is often swept under the carpet when the
term “separation of church and state” is used polemically – as
it increasingly has been in the campaign by secularists to eradicate
active Christianity.
Given
the – to use an old concept – sinful nature of human beings, no
human or human organisation is infallible. I have an extremely high
view of that Church for which the Bible uses beautiful imagery such
as “the temple of the Holy Spirit”, “the Body of Christ” and
even “the Bride of Christ”. But that Church will only be revealed
fully when Christ returns – that will be its first meeting! Those
organisations of human beings which we call “churches” or even –
of our own denomination naturally - “THE Church” are only human
organisations. God may be gracious and work with and through them, he
may care enough to prune and discipline them when they get too
rotten, but they are still very human and frequently dominated by
evil.
If
anyone doubts this, consider the problem of paedophile priests and
church workers, and the lengths bishops and church organisations went
to to silence the victims, cover up rather than to confess terrible
things which had been done, and even, horror of horrors, to protect
paedophiles and allow them to continue! No, the thing we often call
“the church” is still human, fallible and frequently sinful.
So to
allow such an organisation to exert authority over the lawful
government is indeed a bad idea. BUT to go one further and say that
our laws should not exemplify Christian principles, or that avowedly
Christian men and women should be disbarred from being in the
government is a travesty!
Secularists
have urged both these things, and Christians seem to have given way
without a fight. Perhaps it was the mood of the times and fighting
would have been to no avail, but now we must wake up!
The
West is in peril of disintegrating: the freedoms, the laws, the
attitudes, the prosperity that it has produced are in danger of
fading away – or being brutally scrubbed out.
In
the question of church and state we need to believe and proclaim that
we disavow absolutely the bad “old” days of power struggles by
“organised religion” and government and government mandated
churches; and the bad “new” days exemplified by Islamic Sate.
Then we must stand up for the achievements wrought by godly men and
women who knew that the Bible was God's word and that God's aim was
for people to have life and have it in all its abundance.
PS
– no more posts for two weeks
No comments:
Post a Comment