52:
“Who Can Stand Against Such
Reckless Hate”
As fellow fans of J.R.R.Tolkein may
recall, when Theoden is in Helms Deep being besieged by orcs who are
attacking as though (to quote from farther on in The Lord of the
Rings) “the whips of Sauron were behind them”, he looked at the
waves of frenzied attackers and said “who can stand against such
reckless hate”. Looking back now this seems an apt description of
the situation I faced then. The “superspirituals” and through
them some of their acolytes were attacking with just such a “reckless
hate” seemingly indefatigable and heedless of the hurt it was
causing the congregation or even the toll it was taking on
themselves.
I have quoted Nick’s words when he
said that I had to be got out of the ministry even if the parish had
to be destroyed to accomplish this. I have quoted from the then
vestry secretary about the “hate-speak” that was hurled at me
during vestry meetings, and the promise by a spokesman for Shirley’s
supporters that they would drive me out of the parish or drive me to
a nervous breakdown within six months.
But then from June 1993 when I
disbanded the music group, excluding Shirley from the new one and
dismissed Nick Elith their rage knew no bounds.
At the church service the Sunday after
I had disbanded and re-formed the music group I announced simply that
I had dismissed Nick. Immediately a man who was one of Shirley’s
home group leapt to the microphone (he must have come prepared) read
out the Gospel passage where Jesus warns against “false prophets”
and says we will know them by their fruit. He then shouted “David
Greentree is a false prophet - you can see it by his fruit: he has
dismissed Nick and Shirley!”
Interestingly a few years later this
same man - who had by that time not been attending our church for I
suppose eighteen months told an investigating committee that he felt
“completely buggered”. I would say the cause of this feeling was
that he had been eaten up by this own reckless hate.
The day I announced that I had
dismissed Nick and most weeks thereafter Nick staged sit-in
demonstrations in church. Yes, in church during the service!
Typically he would pick a prominent position in the church and
ostentatiously kneel in prayer throughout the service - taking no
part in the liturgy or singing - and at least the first week when
people were taken by surprise, his actions forced people to climb
over him to be able to go up to communion. He of course did not take
Communion but knelt there with a pained expression on his face so
that people could see just how hurt he was.
The Nick and Shirley supporters also
tried to disrupt church services week after week. They would sit as a
body and very conspicuously not take part in the service - sitting
there resolutely not saying the liturgy or singing. At the passing of
the peace they refused to pass the peach with any outside their
number, spurning any other members of the congregation who tried to
pass the peace with them. One very heavily built man - the same one
as it happens that abused me when I first came as locum because I was
living in “Jack’s house” - actually threatened to punch me in
the nose when I tried to pass the peace with him! This group would
noisily chat amongst themselves or ostentatiously read books during
the sermon.
This made worship difficult for many
people and some stopped coming to church because of the bad
atmosphere these people were working very hard to create.
I also found on more than one occasion
that when new people came to the church, members of this group would
seek them out after the service and tell them not to come back saying
things like “there is evil in this church” and “the minister is
evil”.
This went on without relief for month
after month. Even after this group as a body had left and were
worshipping elsewhere they kept sending a group - it looked as though
on a rotating roster - to try to disrupt our services.
The supporters of Nick and Shirley said
they were “Holy Spirit people”, and considered themselves a sort
of spiritual elite, more holy than the other members of the
congregation. and indeed they were very eager for the “gifts” of
the Holy Spirit particularly the more showy ones. But I noticed early
that they were not at all interested in that work of the Holy Spirit
in a believer’s life that “puts to death the old sinful nature”
and trains us to become more like Jesus in all we think and do and
say. This held no interest for them.
The Bible tells us that the “fruit of
the Holy Spirit” in a believer’s life is: Charity, Joy , Peace,
Patience Goodness, Fidelity and Self-control. If you accidentally
flicked the pride of one of these people they reacted swiftly with a
very animated display of all the opposites of these! The bible
exhorts believers “Do not be quick to take offence” They failed
that one 110%!
You may be thinking that I am
exaggerating, or that over the years my memory has played tricks –
which indeed is a common problem in law courts where even the
memories of honest witnesses become notoriously unreliable after a
time. You may also (I hope) be gasping in disbelief and saying
“Surely not! Surely no one would stage sit-in demonstrations during
church services!” So let me quote from the statutory declaration of
a member of the congregation made in 1996 when events were still
fresh in their mind:
“After
Nick xxx was discharged from his position of part –time youth
minister of St. Luke’s in mid 1993 he continued to attend church
for some months after.
During
the services he did not participate in the liturgy, but knelt to pray
rather ostentatiously throughout the service or parts of it,
sometimes praying out loud while David was preaching. He usually
knelt in the back pew next to the isle where everyone went past him
to go up to communion.
There
were a number of others of that group that came to St. Luke’s after
Nick and Shirley were discharged from their former involvement in the
church. These included Shirley and Peter xxx, (another 13 people are
named). Not all of them came at any one time.
When
they did come they chatted among themselves during the services,
particularly when David was preaching and they did not participate in
the service. They did not sing the hymns.
For
a while, at Communion there was usually one other person besides
David administering the bread, and these people went to that end of
the communion rail and thus avoided taking communion from David. When
David discontinued that practice and he alone administered the bread,
then they did not go up to take Communion.
At
the passing of the peace, the members of this group (however many
there were at a time) would turn their backs on any of the members of
the congregation, and especially on David, who tried to pass the
peace with them, they would shake hands with each other.”
All
this time they were very busy lobbying the regional bishop, the
archbishop and anyone else they thought might do what they wanted.
They went about this with a frenetic fervour and indefatigable
energy. I feel Tolkien would have thought of them that “the very
whips of Sauron” were driving them on,
As
they still held a majority on the church council, you can imagine
what fun those monthly meetings were. I only survived by a great deal
of prayer and the protection of the Holy Spirit. I would pray
earnestly
before
each meeting for God's protection, indeed for Him to be my shield and
strength.
I
then went to those meetings
with
what in my minds eye was a bodyguard of angels. (I
know that is only imagery – Jesus only needs to say the word and it
is done! But that was the image I had and it was very kind of God to
let me have that symbolic
reassurance.)
So at the meetings it was in a spiritual sense like being behind
bullet proof glass. I could see what they were doing but I was not
killed by it. Something still got through and Sue and I had to pray
afterwards for God to
remove those spiritual or psychic barbs which had penetrated.
It
was not pleasant, I would not wish it on anyone else, but because of
God's protection, I survived.
It
is (almost) laughable that God's protective shield must have been
evident to them. One complaint the archbishop passed on to me was
that they said that
at vestry meetings I
was like a diver in one of those heavy deep sea diving suits – I
needed to take it off and allow myself to be vulnerable!
No comments:
Post a Comment