Ch.8: Moore College Pt.
1
It is February 1976. My career in
engineering has ended. I have been studying Biblical Greek for the
past few months on my own and just finished a two week intensive at
the college. Crunch time has come and I start lectures at Moore
College in Sydney.
It is a bit of a jolt
to the system. Psychologists might nod their heads and say something
like: “That is all to be expected, leaving one's career and going
back to being a student after being in a work environment is bound to
be stressful.” They would be correct. However all the incoming
students had similar experiences. One already had a PhD in science,
and a wife and three children, and found being being treated like a
teenage undergraduate rather trying. Others had been engaged in
various careers, from teachers to businessmen and
nearly all were married, many
with children. So we were all encountering these
stress factors, and there was a camaraderie among
us that made it all easier to bear.
There was also a
spiritual conflict that we all suffered the effects of although
I didn't understand any of this until many years
later.
Let me try to explain
this spiritual conflict by a
human analogy. Imagine a
scene in France in the latter part of World War II. Perhaps at a time
when Germany had for all intents and purposes been defeated, but the
Allied armies had not actually arrived at some
particular French village.
Although the Nazi's are defeated,
the Gestapo are still active. Suppose for our illustration that the
local Gestapo learn about a French Resistance training camp. What
will the Gestapo do? Obviously they will try to destroy it! If they
cannot reach it by ground they will probably order the Luftwaffe to
divert aircraft to bomb and strafe it.
Given human behaviour
towards an 'enemy' training camp, we should allow the likelihood that
spiritual forces of evil would be at least as clever. My
point is that the spiritual forces of evil would likely single
out for attack any
institution which was being used by God to further his work of saving
the world. At times this would be accomplished by humans acting under
the compulsion of evil spiritual forces – as the many persecutions
of Christians over the millennia demonstrates. When there
is not visible persecution we should expect that
evil spiritual forces will still use
whatever other powers may be at their disposal to harry and
spiritually and psychologically harass important
institutions – in this case the staff and
students at a sound Theological college.
The moment I stepped
inside the gates of the college I felt this almost overwhelming
oppressive feeling. I also think – admittedly looking back nearly
forty years later – that many of the staff were also suffering
under this spiritual attack.
Because neither we nor they understood what
it was, instead of it uniting
us – as for
instance people say happened
during the “blitz” in England - staff
reacted to their own hurt by being less than supportive to
the students.
I also had an
additional personal problem : depression. Even now men tend not to
talk about their depression,
and that is after decades of medical public information programmes.
In those days it was little understood and never talked about. I
will come back to this in later chapters, for now suffice it to say
that I went from an emotional 'high' state throughout secondary
school to depression at university. There were, (as
is generally the case with depression)
good years and bad years, but it would
not be shaken off decisively until 2003 (that too
is a story for a later chapter). 1976 was going
to be one of the bad years.
Moore College was
different at many levels to most other theological colleges. Much of
what Moore was like belongs to another story not this one about my
adventures with God. But I should
at least illustrate the sheer magnitude of difference
for the benefit of those who may find it hard to
imagine. Wile I was a curate
a retired Archdeacon filled in one time for the vicar while he was on
holidays. This archdeacon had spent his whole ministry in the
Australian Anglican church. He was a tremendously devout
Anglo-catholic with a huge amount of wisdom in pastoral matters. But
I still remember this dear man chiding me gently
when in all innocence I had set up for the weekday Eucharist in the
liturgical colour of the season - failing
to notice that it was in fact a minor saint's day which required a
different colour. He said simply: “I cannot believe that they did
not teach you in college to be careful about
changing
to the correct colour for saints days.” No!
Moore College never used
ANY liturgical colour and certainly would never
acknowledge a saint's day!
I thank God with all
my heart that he sent me to Moore. He used it to great effect to
'de-tox.' me from the Liberal
garbage I had fed on. It was also Biblically rigorous in a way very
few theological colleges were. Finally there was
a tremendous mutual spiritual support among the students and lived
out examples
of people living for God and by the unfailing
provision of God. However as
a theological college it was not without serious failings of its own!
Moore College
was Calvinist. I didn't know what that meant then. I read Calvin's
Institutes over the
vacation as all students had
to do. We had to sign a
declaration that we had
carefully read them before
admission to second year. Even
then I still didn't really
understand what it meant. Now
that I do understand what Calvinism is, I can thankfully say (for
their sakes and the sakes of their congregations) that
I think most ministers trained by Moore don't really understand
Calvinism either. Moore College graduates may
think they are Calvinist but
in reality they are not really
“True Believers” at heart.
However the powers that ruled Moore then did
and were!
Calvinism is many
things. The two effects of it
that hit me in that first year were
its distaste for beauty and
its exultation of brutality.
Beauty in worship,
beauty in surroundings – all these things which were perhaps a
trifle overemphasised by “Catholics” were expunged with a
vengeance. For me this almost adoration of the ugly and the harsh was
a source of unhappiness – almost to a pain of deprivation. I
appreciate beauty – from the wonders of nature to
the divine-human
collaboration of the
rose-garden and the heights of architecture to the beautiful music
produced over the centuries by composers out of their adoration of
God.
When
one of my classmates was refused admission to third year on the very
eve of the commencement of term because he had failed Greek (and
it was unthinkable that anyone lacking accomplishment in Greek should
become a minister!) he was taken in by our more
benign sister college in Melbourne (and
ironically after a highly successful parish ministry became not only
an Archdeacon but the one in
charge of theological studies). Later
that year he told me: “Melbourne has discovered
the 11th
Commandment: Love!”
For the true
Calvinist since “hardship produces character” inflicting hardship
on people must be a good thing! This attitude cultivates everything
from simple lack of kindness (as depicted below)
to actual physical or mental brutality (as
I will depict in another chapter).
Moore lectured to its
own syllabus, and I think did
award a Diploma in Arts or some such (I
didn't get one), but to be ordained one had to
sit and pass external exams. For instance I gained a Licentiate of
Theology (Th.L.) awarded by the examining body of the Anglican Church
of Australia which has as examiners and board members lecturers and
officials from all the theological colleges of Anglican persuasion in
Australia.
Students at Moore in
my day were in addition strongly
encouraged to sit the exams for what was called
“the London B.D.” which was a degree conferred by a college whose
name I can't recall in London, and gained by sitting (in
Australia) exams set and marked by that college.
The reason was I suspect to have clergy trained by Moore but able
to boast a “real” degree in theology.
However Moore taught
what it taught and it was up to students to find out what the
syllabus covered by these external examining bodies was
and then find out for themselves anything not
covered in the Moore course. The thing that struck me in first year
was perhaps trivial but
indicative of their attitude towards their students:
that for the London B.D. (which I did
attempt for one year) Moore expected students
to attempt it but did not
tell them how to go about
enrolling in it! It was only by a student network that one found out
a) what the name of the “London B. D.” college was, b) the
enrolment procedure, c) what the syllabus was and d) that the trick
was to buy and regurgitate
“model answers” to the most likely exam questions!
In recent years one
of my daughters managed to organise herself into a course at Oxford
University without any guidance
so I now realise that there are areas where students are expected to
manage all this (and even NOT
resort to using model
answers!) However for me and as I recall the other students it felt
like the bit in Exodus where Pharaoh orders the Israelites to keep
making the same quota of bricks but now have to go
and find their own straw!
To cut a long story
short, psychologically things went downhill. Hebrew started off a
snack. (and really fun – I still remember the thrill of translating
the story of Joseph and finding little gems such
as that that his Egyptian master – the head of
Pharaohs bodyguard - was in Hebrew called Pharaoh's
“chief butcher”. It has a
certain ring to it!) By the end of the year I had collapsed in a heap
and failed the London B. D. exam in Hebrew. I didn't try it in second
year.
The
effects depression became worse even
though I was still living at home – which had very beautiful
surroundings, rather than on campus (which was ugly) and still
worshipping at St. Swithun's,
which was very supportive and involved no duties. The college day
involved chapel, then two 50minute lectures, then communal coffee and
biscuits standing around on the porch,
two more lectures them communal lunch in the dining hall. Then free
study, with occasional activities like Prayer Group (which I will
explain next). I just couldn't face the human interaction required to
stand round with my classmates at morning coffee! I
ended up with a prescription for Vallium
which got me through. If I
took one between the two lectures I could just force myself to appear
suitably convivial at morning tea!
Prayer Group was
another shock. I was
absolutely not
familiar with the concept of a “prayer group” This is a little
embarrassing for someone training to be a minister! But it was true.
I initially rebelled at the
idea of having to go to one,
but luckily there was no choice in this at Moore.
The half dozen first, second, third and fourth year students rostered
into a group met at the house
on campus of the designated leader. We talked about things we wanted
to share for a half hour and then prayed, going one after the other
around the circle. I have never forgotten the sheer terror as my turn
to pray approached, particularly if I was near the end and someone
else had already prayed for the 'prayer point' I had myself been
mentally trying to formulate a prayer for.
Laugh as you may,
that was how I felt – but despite my awkwardness and embarrassment
it was a fabulous group! Prayer works! (well no, that is
not theologically correct: It is God who works,
but he likes his children to ask,
and then delights to do more than they even dared to ask!) It was
truly wonderful!
Just before I close
this section, let me end on a less embarrassing
note: That was first year. Second year brought
another tremendous prayer group, and by then I was getting a bit more
relaxed about praying. In
third year I was put into the group of an overseas priest who was
doing further study at Moore that year. However
Frances, the priest in question, with typical reticence (He and his
wife Gerda both had that devastating humility of really outstanding
Christians – Frances soon
after became a bishop in his native Tanzania) declined and asked me
to lead it – which I did. So I went from not even believing in
prayer groups to leading one in just two years!
No comments:
Post a Comment